Stricken
Swami
Editorial
from Greater Kashmir
http://greaterkashmir.com/news/2010/Sep/1/stricken-swami-14.asp
Srinagar
wednesday, September1, 2010
A delegation of Indian Civil
Society headed by Swami Agnivesh visits Kashmir in the wake of
an unprecedented situation that has engulfed present day
Kashmir. No harm coming to Kashmir and meting whosoever
they wanted to meet, but there is a rider. The rider doesn’t
come from someone who has any control on the situation, or has
anything to do with who comes and who doesn’t to Kashmir. It
comes from a common sufferer of this situation. And the rider is
this; if you come to Kashmir and see for yourself what has been
done to Kashmir by the state authorities sitting in Delhi, you
must raise your voice against the oppressor back home. It is one
small thing that if happens may not change the fate of Kashmir,
but at least will change the perception of Kashmiris towards all
such delegation that come from India to Kashmir, especially in
the times like we confront today, and also spare some
oppression. Right from 1990s, people from India, in different
capacities, have trickled into this bleeding Valley trying to
sympathise with the suffering people. Teams from Indian
mainstream political parties, fringe political groups, social
activists, feminists, human rights activists, journalists and
other civil society groups have been consistently flowing in the
direction of this unhappy valley for reasons as myriad as could
be; needless to say that all the groups and some prominent names
cannot be brushed alike. While the majority of them have been
sniffing around to discover some ready lines that can be hooked
on to get an access to the internal recesses of the Kashmiri’s
politics, there are exception who spoke for the tyrannised
masses without any equivocation. Between these two extremes lay
the majority who only come to do their professional job no
matter to whose advantage or disadvantage that goes. However,
the dominant impression about all the visiting
‘sympathisers’ is that they come, they see, but they never
concur to speak for the oppressed when they are back in the land
of master. If Swami Agnivesh and his team have come to Kashmir
we have no reason doubting their intensions, or thinking of them
as wave breakers ultimately working to the advantage of the one
who is actually responsible for the bloodshed in Kashmir, but we
do have our reservations. And all these reservations are rooted
in the experiences that Kashmir has had with many such
delegations. We wish that Swami Agnivesh, a social activist and
Known Arya Samaji, who has his own standing in Indian political
circles, proves us wrong. We would be delighted if our cynicism,
coming almost closer to rejection, is blown to bits. We in
Kashmir earnestly desire that people like Swami prove us wrong
this time around. They can do it by entering into a dialogue
with their own people in India. When last time Sri Sri Ravi
Shankar came to Kashmir in 2008, there was a nice message that
was dropped to him that he actually needs to talk about peace in
India, because the trouble comes from that end. Similarly Swami
and his group can contribute to peace if they educate their own
people about the truth in Kashmir. If they can fight the
misinformation campaign undertaken by the political
establishment of India right from the times of Nehru they can
concretely contribute to peace. Though it’s a good idea to
help establish channels of communication between pro-freedom
leadership of Kashmir and the people of Indian states, but even
more is needed an honest retelling of a story called Kashmir by
people like Swami Agnivesh themselves. If Swami Ji begins with
his own Arya Samaj, a known socio-religious reform movement, he
will be doing a noble job. Likewise if all such groups candidly
speak about the situation in Kashmir and prepare India to
question their power centers, Kashmir can be spared much of the
oppression. If only it can be brought home that the political
establishment of India is being seen as a tyrant who ‘when
cried the little children died in the streets’, an 8 year boy
might not be thrashed to death.
|
|
|